Respondent urged his name in amended Constitution. Petitioner applied for name in Trust Register after late Mahant. NATHU LAL GUPTA) Date of Order/Judgment: ĬW / 14442 / 2019 (MAHANT RAMPRAKASH DAS SWAMI VS ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (I)) Date of Order/Judgment: SAC / 13 / 2019 (RAMESHWAR PRASAD SHARMA S/O DEVI SHARAN SHARMA VS NAND KISHOR GUPTA S/O SH. Issue of partial eviction also decided in favour of plaintiff. Decree for eviction is just and proper, requires no interference, same affirmed.
#New idm serial key 2016 trial#
Trial Courts finding on default affirmed, benefit of first default already extended, no jurisdictional error in appreciation of evidence on bonafide and reasonable necessity. This court opined first appeal unwarranted, for ulterior motive,malafide, superfluous, unscrupulous litigation. Liberty to petitioner initiate separate proceedings.Appeal allowed.ĬFA / 680 / 2004 (MAHENDRA YADAV S/O LATE SHRI GHASIRAM YADAV VS BHAGWAN DEVI W/O LATE SHRI KRISHAN SHARAN SHARMA,) Date of Order/Judgment: Īppeal against decree of eviction, recovery of rent. This court denied upholding transaction of sale as void relying on Apex Court’s judgment, denied taking back of possession, denied guilt of impleaded contemnors as no specific role played by them. Special Appeal against order of Learned Single Judge holding contemnors guilty,confirmation of sale and issuance of certificate as void ab initio, directed to take back possession of property.
NATHU LAL GUPTA) Date of Order/Judgment: SHANKAR JHA (MANAGER) VS NAND KISHOR GUPTA S/O SH. Trial courts order not interfered, petition dismissed. Petition dismissed.ĬRLR / 233 / 2022 (AKHERAJ VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN) Date of Order/Judgment: Ĭourt observed that as per 167(2)(a)(I)Cr.P.C, 90 days be computed when investigation to that particular offence began, 90 days is counted when investigation of fresh offence starts not from date of FIR, right to seek statutory bail accrues as indefeasible right only if remedy availed within prescribed window from the date of expiry of total period of detention of accused person(s) u/s 167(2)Cr.P.C., until filing of the charge-sheet. would include both, a permanent as well as a temporary residence. Jaswant Singh AIR 1963 SC 1521 court opined that the term “resides” as under Section 126 Cr.P.C. Petitioners challenged jurisdiction of Bhinmal Court as respondents are temporary residing there. Petitions devoid of merit, dismissed.ĬRLTP / 14 / 2021 (AMIT AGARWAL VS NEETU AGARWAL) Date of Order/Judgment: Ĭase pertains to conferment of jurisdiction upon the courts where temporary residence of party is there.
.jpg "new idm serial key 2016")
Injunction against infrastructural project is against statutory provisions. This Court opined that allotment is on Banjar land not on restricted land, does not-affect flora-fauna, natural flow of water, area beyond 50 acres could be allotted under amended Rajasthan Land Revenue (Allotment of Land for Setting Up of Power Plant based on Renewable Energy Sources) Rules, 2007. Petitions against land alloted to company by State Government for solar project. Petition dismissed.ĬW / 8472 / 2021 (JAL GRAHAN VIKAS SANSTHA VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN) Date of Order/Judgment: Court opined petition as malafide, fanciful and unrealistic, prejudice to the public at large by noncompletion of the census operations not established, census activities are to be undertaken in accordance of Act, is a sovereign function of the CG, questioning bonafides of the executing authorities unreasonable. Petition branded as PIL to direct Central Government to conduct census activities in specified time and declare Section 3 of Census Act, 1948 as ultra vires. Exercised inherent power u/s 482 regarding proceedings fundamentally void, abuse of process of Court, allowed petition.ĬW / 3472 / 2022 (HAIDER KHAN VS UNION OF INDIA) Date of Order/Judgment: Engagement of a child in any case does not amount to an offence under section 11 of the Act. Court opined that marriage is a sine qua non to constitute an offence under Act. Petition challenging case pending before Judicial Magistrate registered under section 11 and 15 of Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006. CRLMP / 6586 / 2021 (ANOP SINGH VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN) Date of Order/Judgment:
0 kommentar(er)
